As a broad and wordy topic, "the meaning of writing blog posts" is something I often write about. I once searched for the word "blog" in the National Philosophy and Social Sciences Academic Journal Full-text Database, and this thing called a blog has a unique meaning in the transformation of social concepts, leading society towards a more open direction in specific eras. Of course, blogs are also used for education and teaching, and I haven't encountered using blogs for teaching yet. That paper sounds good, but who has put it into practice in their own education?
Currently, a blog is about publishing something of one's own, sometimes posting photos taken by oneself, or writing one's own words. Even if those words are illogical, they can still be posted. For life blogs, if the things recorded are just miscellaneous things in one's life, then the comments on that article are probably just complaints.
What's the use of complaining? It's well known that typing takes time. Instead of spending that time complaining with others and feeling depressed, it's better to spend more time thinking about how to solve the problem. Instead of using that time to express one's recent life, it's better to spend more time planning for the future and living seriously.
This article is only aimed at blog posts that are relatively deep. (I don't mean to express how deep my own blog posts are)
If we publish these blog posts just to immerse ourselves more in our own emotional world, then writing these blog posts may not be beneficial to us, nor to everyone else. Our Chinese teacher once said, "Suffering is the norm, happiness is precious." If we immerse ourselves in this piece of happiness that belongs to us, how can we make progress? See the explanation on valuable and original content for more details.
In addition to doubting the meaning of blog posts, I also have doubts about blog comments. When I browse other people's blogs, I encounter comments that have nothing to do with the content of the article, such as "first" or "want to exchange links?" and so on (I have done this before). Some comments clearly show that the person hasn't read the content of the article. These comments are purely for the sake of commenting, for the sake of mutual visits, or for the sake of having a website link.
The Ten-Year Covenant does indeed include the spirit of "mutual visits," but what we need to see is also "sincerity," which requires not speaking in clichés. I saw a blogger in the Ten-Year Covenant group who was commenting everywhere, saying that they were lucky to have traveled here through a wormhole and hoped to make a friend...
What is the purpose of comments? When you are seriously reading an article, you may have opinions on the viewpoints of the article or find that the arguments used in the article or the methods written in the article are incorrect. These can be discussed through comments. Other comments that are unrelated to the content of the article, such as "the website design is beautiful," can be ignored.
You may notice that comments are not allowed on this article.